Login | Register 
FEATURES
APPLICATIONS
DOWNLOADS
EDUCATION
BLOG
WIKI
FORUM
STORE

CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Discuss graphics hardware, computer hardware, and input/output devices to use with TouchDesigner

CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby Achim » Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:09 am

There was a talk on recording performances on the mailing list some weeks ago, so this might be interesting (found via createdigitalmotion)
http://www.cineform.com/products/CineFormRecorder.htm

Cologne area TD artists? Let’s get in touch

Achim
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cologne

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby greg » Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:03 pm

Regarding recording to disk,

I have a 4-core machine. Mixxa's built-in recording to QuickTime on disk is almost impact-less. Example:

Comping at 440x330 was running at 43 frames per second.
Comping AND recording at 440x330 was running at 43 frames per second. 0-impact.

Comping at 640x480 was running at 35 frames per second.
Comping and recording at 640x480 was running at 31 frames per second. Some impact, not too bad.
User avatar
greg
Staff
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:08 am

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby ben » Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:32 pm

This box does HD recording though :D

I don't think many single drive systems could handle HD bandwidth writing at 30fps yet. Maybe solid state disks will be able to handle it, and it looks like 2008 might be the year they become readily available.
User avatar
ben
Staff
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby Achim » Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:36 am


Cologne area TD artists? Let’s get in touch

Achim
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cologne

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby jim ellis » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:02 am

Yes, IOdrive is promising and $.
projected at $30 a gig, and 80 gig is the smallest size that one will be able to obtain.

Thanks for the clue in!

Jim
User avatar
jim ellis
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:33 pm

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby massta » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:52 pm

Was researching how Turbo Cache works. Was wondering if it's memory was just as fast as the memory built into the card?
A 128MB GPU has another 895MB Turbo Cache so does that make it 1G of total stored memory. Is that extra 895MB of memory fast enough for real-time? Shouldn't I be looking for GPUs with more dedicated main memory?

Do we need a Fusion card with 80G of flash memory? Where would this benefit the most?

~Shawn


~Shawn
User avatar
massta
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA

Re: CineForm Direct-to-Disk Recorder

Postby malcolm » Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:26 pm

Turbo cache is just your main system memory. Along with using up the main memory, it is also slower than main graphics memory.
User avatar
malcolm
Staff
 
Posts: 4428
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:11 am


Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests